Foreword
Foreword
I have never seen myself as a victim or as part of an oppressed minority.Read the essay
Independent essays and video commentary
First Collection
Deconstructing Pride examines the ideas, institutions and habits that have shaped modern gay identity. Through personal experience and cultural criticism, the collection asks what was gained through liberation—and what was lost when homosexuality became a prescribed way of living, speaking and understanding oneself.
New essay · Essay 07
Identities are not discovered. They are imitated.
Right-wing gays claim their movement was hijacked by queer activists. This essay argues the opposite: queer is the gay identity with its one tangible condition, homosexual desire, removed. Open to anyone, it still behaves like a creed: it seeks converts, at home and abroad.
From the collection
Foreword
I have never seen myself as a victim or as part of an oppressed minority.Read the essay
Essay 03
The victimhood narrative softens the spectacle.Read the essay
Essay 04
Display becomes a substitute for enjoyment.Read the essay
Essay 05
The refusal of restraint became the ultimate form of authenticity.Read the essay
Essay 06
The absence of shame and inner rejection did not protect us.Read the essay
Upcoming essay
Deconstructing Pride
How did the radical politics of the 1960s find a lasting home in universities? What role did the democratization of higher education play in the rise and popularization of gender theory? And how did sexual liberation develop into a political project whose ambitions extend far beyond sexuality itself?
My forthcoming essay, Judith Butler, examines Butler’s own unease with the limitations of gay identity, her turn toward gender, and the curious resistance of queer theory to any stable definition of its subject. It explores the relationship between intellectual authority, political militancy, and institutionalized activism, asking how a tradition committed to challenging established norms acquired an authority of its own.
Butler’s apparent inability to adequately explain the appeal of the manosphere raises a further question: can a philosophy so deeply concerned with vulnerability, recognition, and the prevention of violence make sense of aggression, sexual rivalry, and the renewed attraction of traditional masculinity?
Ultimately, the essay asks whether the revolutionary spirit of 1968 has been kept alive through the institutions it once challenged—and what became of homosexuality when identity itself became an endless political project.
Watch
Stay with the argument
No noise. One link. Unsubscribe anytime.